#1316 theoldmortuary ponders.

The Salt Path at Mountbatten

I don’t believe there are many days when I don’t walk on the Salt Path. I went to see the film yesterday.

Two actors whose work I admire and a beloved landscape.   Versus a book, that I was never quite comfortable with.

People who love the book often question why I don’t love it.

For me, many of the scenarios are  implausible. The book seems to straddle between fact and fictionalised ‘fact’

I didn’t love the film either despite the landscape and the actors. Although I thought both the acting and cinematography were subtle and beautiful. The straddle of fact and fiction discombobulated me.

So one book done, one film done and I still need to be persuaded.

This photograph straddles fact and fiction on the Salt Path.

Two evening photographs taken about 5 seconds apart and with a shift to the west of about 2 degrees. Digitally stuck together as a double exposure and then tidied up.

Photography straddling fact and fictionalised fact on the Salt Path.

P.s What is to be done? Apparently I need to read the second and possibly the third book to gain enlightenment. Let’s see how that goes…

Both now ordered from the library.

3 thoughts on “#1316 theoldmortuary ponders.

  1. I read the book and didn’t know there was a film, but I heard the wife on npr a few years ago and was surprised about the husband’s status. (don’t want to be a spoiler). I liked the book, but wondered about a few things, so your ‘straddled fact and fiction’ comment made some sense. I love the concept of what did though.

    Like

  2. The film is a thing of beauty but we know all the locations so well that the artistic licence was just confusing. I would recommend the film if you can find it. People tell me I will be more sympathetic to the story once I have read book 2. I am open to doing that. Gillian Anderson and Jason Isaacs were brilliantly cast in my opinion as they were absolutely without any vanity.

    Like

Leave a comment